...
Definitive decisions on what should/shouldn’t be handled in Inventory vs. just EDS will be informed by what test custom catalog in EDS looks like and how it handles e-resources with relation to custom catalog. This EDS setup is still in the works.
New e-resource record loads: our goal is to have these handled on the EDS side; we’re trying to see if EBSCO is covering this appropriately for us. In the meantime, we have loaded some e-resource packages to Sierra, though these should’ve been given to EBSCO to load to EDS instead. Need to clear this up and internally clarify our plan here.
To see what is being submitted to HLM, can look in the eHoldings app in FOLIO, but individuals need to be given access.
Holding certain e-resources back from Inventory would have description and authority control implications. MSU theses, for example, won’t be fully described outside of the existing workflow that generates MARC records - this workflow would flow through Inventory. If Naxos records were held back, this would eliminate some authority control work done on Inventory side, but would reduce the end quality of the headings in the records.
Group discussed what has/hasn’t been sent to EBSCO to be loaded to custom database layer in EDS. Don has made these submissions. Will connect with Ranti to start to evaluate what is/isn’t showing up in EDS now that these have been submitted. E.g. Kanopy isn’t showing in EDS yet, even though it’s been loaded. Need answers from EBSCO on this.
TS Council 10-06-21
Present: Joshua Barton, Adam DeWitt, Autumn Faulkner, Ed Gildner, Dao Gong, Ranti Junus, Tim Kiser, Lucas Mak, Emily Sanford, Nicole Smeltekop, Lisa Smith, Kay Granskog
Regrets: Don Depoorter
Agenda
Approve 9-15-21 minutes
FOLIO
Kay turned off tags. Did this cause a problem?
Receiving monographs. Lisa S will demonstrate so you can see some of the questions they are encountering that may affect workflow later.
Imessage = d item records. There were 153,532 item records that are coded Imessage = d which means that when we moved to Millennium from Notis, there was no item record for a title. Should we wholesale move them over to FOLIO? Some information: of these records, 116,916 are for Special Collections leaving 36,616 for all other locations. Another 17,090 are for the Voice, 11,008 are for Main, and 2,081 are for Government Documents.
Comments from everyone about where we are with Theo’s attempt to refresh.
Group thoughts on cat sep, anals, and set add checkin card information and what to keep.
Example of each: set add c11150543; cat seps c11397470; Anals c1102740x