Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Enter new notes at the top of this page.

...

1-11-19 (DRAFT)

CATALOGING SHOW AND TELL / ANNOUNCEMENTS

  • Loretta
    • Africana newspapers
  • Emily
    • made progress clearing out inherited serials backlog
    • some order record slips from the 70s and 80s!
  • Nicole
    • SPC manuscript collections with several challenging cataloging decisions
      • handmade postcards with various maps from all over the world
      • digital video files 
  • Mike
    • Zine comic books
    • learning the difference between Randy's local terms for New Wave comics (usually handmade, underground in nature, etc.) and Alternative comics (not mainstream but clearly published material, ready for sale, etc.)
  • Jessica
    • continuing cataloging education with Africana book series in Chinese
    • first attempts at name authority work
  • Cathy
    • collectible card albums from mid-20th century with popularized depictions of colonial Africa
    • interesting from a historical perspective, presents some challenges in terms of subject analysis
  • Autumn
    • cataloged a coursepack and found little guidance in RDA or among best practices communities, and no helpful examples in OCLC
    • hard to determine nature of material and responsibility roles – a mix of reproduced published content and professor's supplied bibliographical content
    • cataloged as unpublished (t workform) and professor as contributor (700) with $e organizer relationship designator

HIGHLIGHTS FROM OCLC ASKQC PRESENTATION ON "WHEN TO INPUT A NEW RECORD"

  • presented by Jay Weitz of OCLC, a well-respected cataloging instructor and database quality expert
  • covered mostly familiar territory of OCLC's Bib Formats Chapter 4 "When to Input a New Record"
  • some new information:
    • for M level pre-publication records, differences between the piece in hand and the 245, 250, 260/264, and 490 fields should be regarded as less significant; catalogers should consider upgrading the M-level record, rather than creating a new record
    • when creating a new record for a similar edition, catalogers are encouraged to supply their own 250 statement in order to prevent OCLC's de-duplication program from zapping the new record
      • this is permissible under RDA!
      • Jay has full presentations about this and other "cataloging defensively" techniques
    • OCLC considers a "substantive difference" of pagination to be 3 pages; in resources of 10 pages or less, any difference is substantive
    • OCLC considers a "substantive difference" in dimension to be 2 or more cm
    • OCLC desires catalogers to use Chapter 4 as their primary guide for inputting a new record, and the ALCTS Document "Differences between, changes within" as a complementary set of guidelines

12-18-18 (DRAFT)

QUESTION

  • Do WEMI-to-WEMI relationship designators require qualifiers in all cases?
    • No, we're to use the relationship designator as it appears in RDA Appendix J. For example:
      • 775 08 $i Translation of: $a ...
      • 700 1_ $i Abridged as (work): $a ...

...